Executive summary
- A 1%
rotation out of U.S. Treasuries is roughly $278B of new gold
demand (using SIFMA’s latest estimate that Treasuries outstanding ≈
$27.8T). (SIFMA)
- At
today’s context (gold ~$3.53k/oz on Sep 2–5, 2025), $278B buys ~79.4M
oz ≈ 2,471 tonnes; at $5k/oz it buys ~55.6M oz ≈ 1,729
tonnes. For scale, annual mine supply ≈ 3,661 t and total
above-ground stocks ≈ 216,265 t (bars/coins+ETFs ≈ 48,634 t). (World Gold Council)
- That
flow is huge relative to both quarterly demand value (Q2’25 ≈
$132B) and typical daily trading turnover (~$290B/day across OTC,
futures & ETFs). Even spread out, it materially tilts the tape; if
concentrated and routed via options, it can produce dealer hedging
feedback—i.e., a gamma squeeze. (World Gold Council)
- Price
targets (framework, not prophecy):
- Conservative
flow-only: +40–60% → $4,900–$5,600/oz
- Base
case (flow + some options reflexivity): +70–110% → $6,000–$7,500/oz
- Squeeze/overshoot window (short-dated calls heavy): episodic spikes >$8,000/oz possible, but hard to sustain without continued flow.These bands come from scaling prior ETF-driven episodes (notably ~877 t ETF inflow in 2020 alongside a ~+36% price run) and sizing against current market depth, while layering a realistic options-hedging multiplier (details below). (World Gold Council, Reuters)
1) What a “gamma squeeze” in gold means (and why it can
happen)
Definition (in one line): When call buying
concentrates near-dated, near-the-money strikes, dealers short gamma
must buy futures as price rises (and sell if it falls) to keep
neutral—this feedback accelerates upside (“gamma squeeze”). (Schwab Brokerage, ScienceDirect)
Why it’s plausible in gold right now:
- The listed
derivatives stack is large. As of Fri, Sep 5, 2025, CME’s daily
bulletin shows COMEX gold options open interest ~0.80M contracts
(calls ~0.49–0.69M; puts ~0.30–0.38M depending on line item), each on 100
oz—i.e., option OI notionally ties to ~2,400–2,800 t of gold.
That is the powder keg a call-wave can act on.
- Implied
vol is moderate (GVZ ~18 for 30-day GLD options), so vega is
“affordable,” gamma is punchy in the front end. (FRED)
- CME’s CVOL
framework and open-interest tools confirm where strikes/expiries cluster;
when OI stacks close to spot and near expiry, market-wide gamma
becomes most sensitive. (CME Group)
2) Sizing a 1% Treasury → gold rotation
Treasury base: latest SIFMA comment put U.S.
Treasuries outstanding ≈ $27.8T (Q1’25). 1% → $278B. (SIFMA)
Gold the rotation would buy:
- At $3,500/oz:
$278B → ~79.4M oz → ~2,471 t
- At $5,000/oz:
$278B → ~55.6M oz → ~1,729 t
For scale:
- Annual
mine supply (2024): ~3,661 t; total supply (incl. recycling): ~4,974
t. A $278B buy ticket equals 47–67% of a year’s mine output
(depending on price), or ~35–50% of total annual supply. (World Gold Council)
- ETF
precedent: In 2020, ~877 t net ETF inflow (~$48B)
coincided with a ~+36% move from Jan→Aug 2020. Today’s $278B
is ~5–6× that dollar size (and ~2–3× the tonnes, depending
on price), hinting at large flow-driven upside even before any
options reflexivity. (World Gold
Council)
- Turnover
lens: WGC puts average daily trading across OTC/futures/ETFs at
roughly $290B/day recently. A $278B program is ~one day’s
global turnover. Pushed quickly (or skewed to options), that’s impactful;
stretched over months, the price impact softens but still
accumulates. (World Gold Council)
3) Price-target framework (with the math that gets you
there)
Think of the price in layers: (A) base flow impact + (B)
options-gamma reflexivity + (C) second-round effects
(short-covering, momentum, FX, central banks).
A) Flow-only impact (calibrated to 2020)
- 2020
anchor: 877 t ETF inflow ↔ ~+36% price. Using a simple
proportionality, 1,729–2,471 t (your $278B) maps to ~+71% to
+101%.
- Apply
to spot ≈ $3,532/oz (early Sep 2025):
- +71%
→ ~$6,050/oz
- +101% → ~$7,100/ozCaveat: 2020 had unique macro tailwinds, so I treat this as upper-middle of base range. (World Gold Council, Reuters)
B) Options reflexivity / gamma squeeze overlay
If 20–30% of the $278B rotation expresses via short-dated
calls (common for levered macro expressions), dealer hedging can amplify
flow impact:
- From
the OI math earlier, a mere 1% up-move can demand ~20–40 t
of dealer hedge buying if near-ATM OI is thick. A 3–5% multi-day
grind can easily cascade into 100–200 t of incremental
buying from hedgers alone. That’s non-trivial vs. mine supply pace,
and it pulls forward upside.
- Result:
add another +10–20% to the flow-only levels during a squeeze while
it lasts.
C) Second-round effects
- Central
banks: still persistent net buyers (>1,000 t/yr pace in
recent years), tending to fade dips rather than rallies—a
structural bid. (World Gold Council)
- FX
& rates: the GVZ ~18 regime means bursts of vol aren’t
“expensive”; a weakening USD or policy shocks can tilt the target higher.
(FRED)
Putting it together—scenario bands
|
Scenario |
Assumptions |
Implied move |
Target |
|
Conservative |
$278B spread over 6–9 months, mostly physical/ETFs;
limited options |
+40–60% |
$4,900–$5,600 |
|
Base case |
50–70% to physical/ETFs, 30–50% to futures/options;
moderate dealer short-gamma |
+70–110% |
$6,000–$7,500 |
|
Squeeze / overshoot |
Short-dated call concentration, dealers persistently short
gamma; flow bunches in weeks |
+120–>150% (episodic) |
>$8,000 (brief spikes) |
Your $5,000 target is well within the conservative
band if any meaningful fraction of the $278B pushes through quickly, even
without a full-blown gamma loop.
4) Why the market could mechanically gap higher
- Market
size vs. flow: Q2’25 total demand value = $132B. Dropping $278B
into this ecosystem is a 2× quarterly shock. (World Gold Council)
- Trading
capacity: $278B ≈ one full day of global turnover; price impact
is convex when the risk-absorption (dealers, miners,
recyclers) cannot scale linearly day-by-day. (World Gold Council)
- Derivatives
gearing: With ~0.8M options contracts OI outstanding and futures
OI ~0.49M, even a partial shift into calls forces
hedge-buys on the way up, the hallmark of a squeeze. (YCharts)
5) Key risks / reality checks
- Time
profile of the rotation matters. A slow, programmatic shift
spreads impact; a front-loaded move can overshoot then mean-revert
as gamma decays.
- Elasticity
is asymmetric. Jewelry/fabrication falls at high prices (demand
destruction), recycling rises, both cushioning extremes. That
moderates how long >$7k can persist without continued flow. (World Gold Council)
- Volatility
regimes change. If GVZ spikes to high-20s/30s, option premia
jump, slowing new call demand; conversely, put demand can flip
net gamma long for dealers, dampening squeezes. (FRED)
References (most load-bearing)
- Treasury
base: SIFMA—Treasuries outstanding $27.8T (Feb 2025). (SIFMA)
- Gold
supply & stocks: WGC—Above-ground stock 216,265 t
(end-2024); bars/coins+ETFs 48,634 t; mine supply 2024 ≈ 3,661 t.
(World Gold Council)
- Trading
turnover: WGC—gold trading ≈ $290B/day. (World Gold Council)
- ETF
precedent: WGC—2020 ETF inflows 877 t (~$47.9B) alongside major
price rise. (World Gold
Council)
- Current
price context: Reuters—record highs $3,532/oz set in early Sep
2025. (Reuters)
- Options/hedging
plumbing: CME daily bulletin (Sep 5, 2025) showing gold
options OI ~0.8M contracts; CME CVOL/tools; Cboe GVZ ~18
as 30-day IV. (FRED)
Bottom line
If 1% of Treasuries ($278B) rotates into gold, $5,000/oz
is not only plausible—it sits inside the low end of what flow math
+ today’s market microstructure can deliver. The path (and
whether we print $8k+ spikes) hinges on how much of that flow shows
up as short-dated calls—because that is what turns steady demand
into a self-feeding gamma loop.
No comments:
Post a Comment